State School Debt-Free or Ivy-League Drowning in Debt?
The Minneapolis Star Tribune published a story today about whether it matters if you attend a “big name†college.
The first student profiled, Luna Yang, has “already been admitted to the University of Michigan and has been offered a full ride at the University of Minnesota. … But the mystique of schools like MIT and Harvard tugs at her.â€
What will be the financial impact of her choice of school?
The article briefly discusses research on lasting effects of the college you attend:
“Research on the subject is mixed. Some studies have found that attending an elite school pays off in higher wages over a lifetime, while others say it’s the background of students — things like parental education and income — that has lasting effects.â€
While the research about salary effects of an undergraduate school is “mixed,†it would seem that certain school choices in post-college education will greatly affect salary.
For instance, according to Princeton review, the average starting salary for a graduate from Harvard Law School is $125,000. Compare this to another competitive, top 20 school: the University of Minnesota Law School. The Princeton Review states that the average starting salary for a graduate from University of Minnesota Law School is $75,000. Despite the fact that Minnesota is also a “top†school (albeit, not top-5), the name appears to make a $50,000/year difference.
Personally, despite the mixed research, I think that attending a big-name school will impact your earnings—but is it worth it to go into that much debt? And at what point should you attend that big-name school—for college or for post-college education?
I went to a state school on a scholarship. I got into several “big-name schools†but turned them down because it just didn’t seem financially worth it to me. Why? Because I knew that I wanted to continue my education beyond a Bachelor’s Degree. My parents had set up a 529 account for me that would have covered about 1.5 years at an ivy-league school. The deal was that I could use this money to attend any school at any level—undergraduate, law school, Ph.D, etc. (I think my parents would have helped me out a little more had I decided on an expensive school, but I still would have had to take on a great deal of debt.)
When I made my college decision it wasn’t all about money; but money was a factor. Attending a very good state school with a scholarship just seemed like a better investment in my future. I wouldn’t have to go into debt and when I graduated I would still have some of the money in the 529 account to help with further education.
And this is exactly what happened. I graduated from undergrad debt-free. Even better, I got scholarships to attend a big-name graduate school and am able to use some of the 529 account to cover living expenses. (There are lots of tax-issues here, but you are allowed to take out certain “Room and Board†costs tax-free from a 529).
My overall philosophy was that the last school I attended would have the biggest effect on my job prospects and salary. Thus, by going to a state school for my Bachelor’s I could attend a big-name school later on.
If you had to give financial advice to Luna Yang would you recommend—based on future finances alone— that she attend University of Minnesota on a scholarship or (assuming she gets in) MIT with no scholarship?